It isnt and never has been meant to be used as a science book. Others look upon the bible as an ancient science book. The bible is not a scientific textbook, nor was it ever intended to be read in this way. Some people mishandle the word of truth by forcing it to be something god did not intend it to benamely, a science book. The writers recorded what they received from god exactly as god wanted them to and as. God is both the author of creation and the author of scripture. The bible is not a science book, it isnt a history book either, then.
The bible is not a book about science, but when it does speak scientifically, it is accurate. The bible describes the precision of movement in the universe. James kennedy correctly says about the bible, it is not a scientific textbook. Statements consistent with astronomy the bible says that each star is unique.
I often have people tell me that the bibles not a science textbook. Although christians accept the bible as entirely true, it does not use. Louie is the author of the comeback, the air i breathe, i am not but i know i am. In fact, it was far ahe scientific accuracies of the bible. It reveals god and gods plan for us and the whole universe. There is not place in the bible that disagree with true science, rather it enhances it. Yes, for although the bible is not a science textbook, it is accurate when it mentions matters of science. But the bible is actually a textbook of historical scienceand the only such textbook that is totally reliable and infallible. Likewise, the way we see gods world through science can affect how we understand his word. The bible describes humankinds grand and sublime search. The bible is a book of redemption, and of course i accept the creation story.
But the bible is actually a textbook of historical scienceand the only such. From babylon to america, the prophecy movie by school for prophets attila kakarott. The bible describes the suspension of the earth in space. For many of us, the reality that the bible isnt a science book basically goes without saying. Why the bible is not a science textbook faithlife blog.
The bible isnt a science text book and should not be read as one. The bible is not a science book, but it is scientifically correct. The bible is not a science book, yet it is scientifically accurate. Those who insist on the bible being a reliable science book are actually making a mockery out of it and its original intent which was to tell the story of a remarkable teacher, known as the son of god, and to guide his followers in how to relate to god and one another. An alert reader sent me a very short youtube video of francis collins, nih director, explaining the coexistence of science and evangelical. We have listed statements on this page that are consistent with known scientific facts. In this way, the bible is authoritative on things related to science and history and must be believed. The qur aan is not a book of science but it is a book of signs dr zakir naik duration. Now, im glad the bibles not a textbook of science like those used in public schools, because it would change all the time. Schroeder is the author of several books, including the just released god according to god. Consider some examples showing that science and the bible agree and that the bible contains scientific facts that differed greatly from the beliefs of many people living at the time it was written. I dont think ive ever seen a book that leads kids from inspiring scientific facts into.
Even if the bible had been intended to be a science. For christians, gods word is the lens through which we see his world. The bible is not a textbook of science why evolution is true. Billy graham and creation science old earth creationism. We are not aware of any scientific evidence that contradicts the bible.
361 1245 1252 201 621 543 860 172 549 852 301 267 881 684 775 485 970 814 1565 545 505 1336 771 455 761 1399 1289 88 1031 633 265 1083 1323 908 1320 1383 583